16 Apr 2026 Posted in: Blogs

The QSR Tech Decision: Building vs. Buying Your Tech Stack

In April 2026, Papa Johns’ Chief Digital and Technology Officer Kevin Vasconi made headlines for something most QSR executives think privately but rarely say out loud: “Twenty years ago, it was a competitive advantage in QSR to write your own POS. Today, it’s not.”

Papa Johns ran their own in-house POS for over two decades before their analysis pointed to a hard truth, the market had outpaced their custom build.

If Papa Johns can reach that conclusion, it’s worth asking whether any chain (at any size) should still be building their own tech stack in 2026.

Illustration representing build vs buy decision for restaurant technology

Why do some restaurant chains choose to build their own tech stack?

  1. Customization: Building in-house allows them to tailor technology solutions precisely to their unique needs, thereby enhancing operational efficiency and effectiveness.
  2. Leveraging Analytics: Chains can leverage analytics to create more personalized experiences for customers and optimize operations. For instance, if the analytics are applied with expertise they can target to achieve 20% increase in digital sales by 2026 through data-driven strategies.
  3. Expected Cost-Savings: While the initial investment in building in-house solutions may be higher, there’s an expectation of lower monthly expenses over time. However, the actual cost savings depend on factors such as whether the chain hires its own team (incurring monthly salaries) or engages with an agency (incurring costs for each new addition or modification), both of which can be expensive in their own right.

The challenge is that what felt like a competitive advantage a decade ago has become a maintenance burden. As Vasconi put it: “How you implement and how you use the point of sale is a competitive advantage”, not the act of building it yourself. The differentiation has shifted from ownership to execution.

 

Why is it more strategic to outsource?

When considering omnichannel solutions for restaurant chains, there are critical considerations and risks that they are highly likely to face. However, these risks can be effectively mitigated by partnering with an omnichannel provider.

Key Reasons to Outsource:

  • Complexity of Omnichannel: Managing various touchpoints for customers, in-store employees, and headquarters requires intricate systems and integrations, which can be challenging to develop and maintain independently.
  • Resource Allocation: Smaller chains might not have the resources, both in terms of expertise and finances, to build and sustain a custom tech stack. This could lead to inefficiencies and delays in achieving business goals.
  • Outsourcing Benefits: Outsourcing development and services to experienced providers specialized in QSR-specific solutions can offer advantages such as continuous improvement, lower initial investment, and access to industry best practices.
  • Focus on Core Competencies: By opting for a ready-made omnichannel tech stack, smaller restaurant chains can redirect their focus and resources towards their core competencies, such as serving quality food and enhancing customer experiences.
  • Learning from Industry Leaders: Choosing a solution used by leading and fast-growing brands allows smaller chains to learn from successful implementations and avoid common pitfalls in technology adoption.
  • Real-world validation from global chains: Papa Johns, one of the largest pizza chains in the world, spent over 20 years building their own POS before concluding that buying a proven solution was the smarter path. Their CDTO’s reasoning: the market evolves faster than any internal team can keep up with. Choosing a provider whose roadmap is dedicated entirely to your category means you’re always moving forward, not catching up.
  • Cost of Continuous Innovation: Continuous innovation in technology comes with ongoing costs. Developing and maintaining a custom tech stack requires significant investment in research, development, and upgrades over time. Additionally, building in-house solutions means bearing the entire burden of innovation costs, whereas partnering with a (SaaS) provider allows for shared costs and access to future updates and enhancements.

As an example:

Leveraging a proven omnichannel solution, you can swiftly integrate innovation across in-store operations and the consumer side. Implementing features like AI Estimated Time of Arrival (ETA), one step beyond Uber Eats’ sticky notifications, not only streamlines operations but also enhances the overall customer experience by providing real-time updates and reducing wait times.

The decision to outsource an omnichannel solution that is purpose-built for Quick Service Restaurants (QSRs) emerges as the most logical choice. By selecting the right provider, one that acts as a partner in achieving business goals and shares in the success of the restaurant chain, restaurants can benefit from: increased direct sales, leveraging data to optimize customer experiences, and even accessing insights derived from collaborative data sharing among restaurant chains.

 

The industry is reaching a consensus.

Papa Johns is moving 3,200 locations off a homegrown POS to a purpose-built solution, not because they lacked engineering talent, but because building and maintaining custom technology is no longer where competitive advantage lives. The chains pulling ahead in 2026 are the ones who chose the right platform partner and focused their energy on how to use it, not how to build it.

That’s the shift. From engineering pride to execution excellence.

Contrary to common belief, outsourcing such a solution can actually be more cost-effective than building it in-house.

As an example:

A chain with 50 locations decides to build its own tech stack. They hire 10 developers with monthly salaries and calculate the hours needed for service maintenance. However, when considering both capital expenditures (major, long-term expenses) and operating expenses (day-to-day expenses), the costs can quickly escalate.

By opting for outsourcing, the chain avoids the hefty investment in hiring and maintaining an in-house development team. Instead, they pay a predictable monthly fee to the service provider, which covers both initial setup and ongoing support. Not only does this reduce upfront costs, but it also provides peace of mind knowing that experts are managing the technology stack, allowing the chain to focus on what they do best: serving their customers delicious meals.

Recommended articles for you

Still weighing build vs. buy for your chain?

See how multi-location QSR chains across 15 countries use S4D and what they'd tell you about it.

Daan Bakker

Management

VP of Growth

Daan Bakker

Management

Talk to our team

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.