In April 2026, Papa Johns’ Chief Digital and Technology Officer Kevin Vasconi made headlines for something most QSR executives think privately but rarely say out loud: “Twenty years ago, it was a competitive advantage in QSR to write your own POS. Today, it’s not.”
Papa Johns ran their own in-house POS for over two decades before their analysis pointed to a hard truth, the market had outpaced their custom build.
If Papa Johns can reach that conclusion, it’s worth asking whether any chain (at any size) should still be building their own tech stack in 2026.
The challenge is that what felt like a competitive advantage a decade ago has become a maintenance burden. As Vasconi put it: “How you implement and how you use the point of sale is a competitive advantage”, not the act of building it yourself. The differentiation has shifted from ownership to execution.
When considering omnichannel solutions for restaurant chains, there are critical considerations and risks that they are highly likely to face. However, these risks can be effectively mitigated by partnering with an omnichannel provider.
Leveraging a proven omnichannel solution, you can swiftly integrate innovation across in-store operations and the consumer side. Implementing features like AI Estimated Time of Arrival (ETA), one step beyond Uber Eats’ sticky notifications, not only streamlines operations but also enhances the overall customer experience by providing real-time updates and reducing wait times.
The decision to outsource an omnichannel solution that is purpose-built for Quick Service Restaurants (QSRs) emerges as the most logical choice. By selecting the right provider, one that acts as a partner in achieving business goals and shares in the success of the restaurant chain, restaurants can benefit from: increased direct sales, leveraging data to optimize customer experiences, and even accessing insights derived from collaborative data sharing among restaurant chains.
Papa Johns is moving 3,200 locations off a homegrown POS to a purpose-built solution, not because they lacked engineering talent, but because building and maintaining custom technology is no longer where competitive advantage lives. The chains pulling ahead in 2026 are the ones who chose the right platform partner and focused their energy on how to use it, not how to build it.
That’s the shift. From engineering pride to execution excellence.
Contrary to common belief, outsourcing such a solution can actually be more cost-effective than building it in-house.
A chain with 50 locations decides to build its own tech stack. They hire 10 developers with monthly salaries and calculate the hours needed for service maintenance. However, when considering both capital expenditures (major, long-term expenses) and operating expenses (day-to-day expenses), the costs can quickly escalate.
By opting for outsourcing, the chain avoids the hefty investment in hiring and maintaining an in-house development team. Instead, they pay a predictable monthly fee to the service provider, which covers both initial setup and ongoing support. Not only does this reduce upfront costs, but it also provides peace of mind knowing that experts are managing the technology stack, allowing the chain to focus on what they do best: serving their customers delicious meals.
See how multi-location QSR chains across 15 countries use S4D and what they'd tell you about it.
Daan Bakker
Management